Greater resilience in RPA is achieved through which of the following approaches?

Greater resilience in RPA is achieved through a functional approach because this method centers around the specific functionalities that RPA processes need to fulfill. By emphasizing the behavior and interactions of various functions, the functional approach ensures that automation can adapt readily to changes. This versatility is crucial when processes evolve or when unexpected issues arise, allowing for quick adjustments to maintain operational continuity.

The functional approach helps organizations decompose complex workflows into manageable functions, which can enhance testing, maintenance, and integration with other systems. This adaptability and modularity ultimately lead to improved durability of the RPA solutions.

In contrast, the other approaches may not emphasize flexibility and responsiveness to changes as effectively. For instance, a layered configuration focuses on separating different layers in an architecture, which can enhance clarity but may not address resilience directly. The object-oriented approach mainly centers on encapsulation and reusability of code, which aids in maintaining code quality but does not inherently focus on process adaptability. A systematic approach provides a structured way of automating, but it might lack the dynamic capabilities needed for resilience in rapidly changing environments.